01 September 1998
Relationship of uterine scar strength to pre-labor ultrasound appearance
Jolanta Mazurek-Kantor, Zofia Kietlińska, Beata Śpiewankiewicz, Włodzimierz Sawicki, Jerzy StelmachówMed Sci Monit 1998; 4(5): CR797-802 :: ID: 501984
Abstract
Our study group comprised 587 who gave birth to children following a previous cesarean section. Out of this group, 309 women delivered by a second cesarean section, and 278 delivered vaginally. There was no correlation between the dehiscence ratio and the period of time following the previous cesarean section. Before delivery we measured the thickness of the uterine scar following the previous cesarean section in 482 patients. Out of this group 249 patients delivered by a second cesarean section and 233 underwent natural labor. Among these patients we compared the resistance of the uterine scar during the following labor dependent of its ultrasound thickness. We noted that in scars under 3 mm of thickness (49 patients) the dehiscence of the scar occurred in 90% of patients (44 cases), and in scars above 3 mm of thickness (200 patients) the dehiscence of the scars was noted only in 13% of patients (26 cases). Thickening of the uterine scar is correlated with a decreased incidence of dehiscence. Out of 380 patients who underwent vaginal delivery, 240 received oxytocin at a dose of 2.5 j in 500 ml 0.9% NaCl. This groups ratio of dehiscence with and without the use of oxytocin was comparable. In patients undergoing labor, oxytocin use insignificantly increased successful vaginal delivery. The highest rate of dehiscence and paper-lower segments (43%) occurred in patients (with a previous cesarean section) delivering abdominally following an unsuccessful attempt at vaginal delivery.
Keywords: Cesarean Section, uterine scar, dehiscence, ultrasound, Oxytocin
Editorial
01 April 2024 : Editorial
Editorial: Forty Years of Waiting for Prevention and Cure of HIV Infection – Ongoing Challenges and Hopes for Vaccine Development and Overcoming Antiretroviral Drug ResistanceDOI: 10.12659/MSM.944600
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944600
In Press
07 Mar 2024 : Clinical Research
Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Clinical Trials: A Questionnaire-Based Study of 179 Male Third- and Fourt...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943468
08 Mar 2024 : Animal Research
Modification of Experimental Model of Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) in Rat Pups by Single Exposure to Hyp...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943443
18 Apr 2024 : Clinical Research
Comparative Analysis of Open and Closed Sphincterotomy for the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: Safety an...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944127
08 Mar 2024 : Laboratory Research
Evaluation of Retentive Strength of 50 Endodontically-Treated Single-Rooted Mandibular Second Premolars Res...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944110
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387
01 Jan 2022 : Editorial
Editorial: Current Status of Oral Antiviral Drug Treatments for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Non-Hospitalized Pa...DOI :10.12659/MSM.935952
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935952