01 August 2022>: Clinical Research
Identification of Diagnostic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in 47 Shoulders with Subcoracoid Impingement Syndrome by Comparison with 100 Normal Shoulders
Jia-feng Yu 1ABCDEFG* , Ping Xie 2ABCDEF* , Ke-fu Liu 1ABCDEFG* , Yan Sun 1ABCD , Jing Zhang 1ABCD , Hui Zhu 1ABCD , Yue-hao Chen 1ABCDDOI: 10.12659/MSM.936703
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e936703
Table 2 Comparison of CHD, CI, HLT, CO, CGA, CHA, WST, and CD between normal and subcoracoid impingement syndrome group.
Normal group | Subcoracoid impingement syndrome group | Z value | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CHD (mm) | 7.7±1.5 | 4.7±1.2 | =−9.043 | |
CI (mm) | 16.0±3.3 | 20.1±3.3 | =5.981 | |
HLT (mm) | 5.5±1.0 | 6.6±1.4 | =4.787 | |
CO (°) | 8.9±2.9 | 9.3±3.0 | =0.572 | =0.567 |
CGA (°) | 132.6±8.5 | 126.8±9.6 | =−3.731 | |
CHA (°) | 106.7±9.5 | 110.2±10.5 | =2.205 | =0.027 |
WST (mm) | 5.4±1.3 | 6.4±1.8 | =3.623 | |
CD (mm) | 8.9±2.3 | 10.5±3.8 | =2.233 | =0.026 |
The results are expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD); CHD – coracoid-humeral distance; CI – coracoid index; HLT – height of lesser tuberosity; CO – coracoid obliquity; CGA – coracoglenoid angle; CHA – coracohumeral angle; WST – width of the subscapular tendon; CD – contact distance between subscapular tendon and coracoid process. |